Portfolio Day (May 20) — Reserve your spot

/00 An honest comparison

If something else fits better, use that.

Most freelance instructional designers juggle SCORM Cloud, Loom, Google Drive, Wix, and Articulate Review to show their work. Here is the honest shape of each, side by side with TrainingOS.

Competitor prices are approximate public list pricing for comparison only — not TrainingOS billing.

Feature
TrainingOSTrainingOSFree → $12/mo Pro
SCORM CloudApprox. $75–$899/mo (public plans)
ArticulateArticulateArticulate 360 bundle, approx. $499/yr
LoomLoomFree → approx. $15/user/mo
Google DriveGoogle DriveFree → approx. $6/user/mo
Plays your courses

SCORM 1.2 / 2004 plays in browser

Real runtime with completion and scoring

Yes

SCORM API · full

Yes

Core product

Partial

Storyline-centric

No

Screen recorder

No

Storage only

xAPI / Tin Can hosting

Packages play in browser

Yes

SCORM + xAPI

Yes

Built-in LRS

No
No
No

Video courses (MP4 / embeds)

YouTube, Vimeo, and hosted video

Yes
No

SCORM/xAPI focus

Partial

If embedded in Storyline

Yes
Yes
Looks like your portfolio

Public portfolio page

Branded page with case studies

Yes

trainingos.com/portfolio/you

No
No
Partial

Video grid only

No

Public showcase directory

Inbound discovery for prospects

Yes

50 example portfolios

No
No
No
No

Custom domain

e.g. portfolio.yourstudio.com

Partial

Agency · coming soon

Partial

Enterprise tiers

No
No
No
Sharing with clients

One link for all work types

Yes

SCORM, video, PDF, case studies

Partial

Per-package links

Partial

Per-package review

Partial

Video only

Partial

Folders, not a portfolio

Client review links

Endorse, recommend, review tokens

Partial

Agency plan · shipped

Partial
Partial

Articulate accounts

Yes
Partial

Manual sharing

Embed in LMS via iframe

Moodle, Canvas, TalentLMS, etc.

Yes
Yes
No

Review-only

Partial

Video iframe

No
Freelance studio

Studio time tracking

Billable hours with UTC monthly reset

Yes

10h/mo Free · unlimited Pro

No

LMS admin focus

No
No
No

Studio client CRM

Rates, terms, and client context for projects

Yes

3 clients Free · unlimited Pro

No
No
No
Partial

Contacts, not studio CRM

CSV timesheet export

Export logged hours by client

Yes

Studio workspace

No
No
No
No

Invoice from logged hours

Stripe invoicing from studio timer

Partial

Agency plan

No
No
No
No
Cost reality

Free tier for solo instructional designer

Yes

3 projects · 500MB · 10h studio · 3 clients

Partial

Trial limits apply

No

Requires subscription

Partial

Free tier caps

Yes

15GB free tier

Annual cost for unlimited portfolio use

TrainingOS Pro vs alternatives (approx.)

Yes

$99 / year

Partial

Scales with learners

No

Articulate 360 bundle

Partial

Per-seat video plans

Partial

Workspace storage tiers

Built for

Target user

Yes

Freelance + in-house IDs sharing work

Partial

LMS admins

Partial

Articulate-only teams

Partial

Async video updates

Partial

General file storage

/01Honest takesBy the alternative

What each tool is actually good at.

SCORM Cloud · use it for

The conformance + dispatch power tool.

Rustici built the SCORM spec. If you are testing edge cases of SCORM 2004, SCORM Cloud is the rigorous choice. Dispatch for selling courses to multiple LMS clients is a different job than a freelancer portfolio.

  • Most rigorous SCORM testing tools available.
  • Dispatch is strong for multi-LMS distribution.
  • UI is LMS-admin-shaped, not portfolio-shaped.
  • Pricing scales with active learners — gets expensive fast.

Different job. Keep SCORM Cloud for dispatch and conformance testing. TrainingOS does not compete with that.

Articulate Review · skip it for portfolios

Built for stakeholders, not strangers.

Review 360 is for coworkers leaving timestamped comments on Storyline files — not for hosting an open portfolio. Commenters often need an Articulate account, and there is no portfolio layout or case-study story.

  • Great for in-team Storyline feedback inside Articulate 360.
  • Login walls hurt prospect conversion on a public portfolio.
  • No STAR case studies or multi-tool showcase.
  • Articulate-authored content only — not a mixed portfolio.

Keep Review for stakeholder feedback. Do not make it the front door to your career.

Loom · for talking heads, not interactivity

Records you clicking — not the learner.

Loom is excellent for async updates and walking a client through a deck. As a portfolio, prospects watch you narrate instead of experiencing branching, assessments, and simulations.

  • Fast screen-rec workflow for client walk-throughs.
  • Useful for kickoff intros and project recaps.
  • Branching, drag-and-drop, and simulations are invisible.
  • Long narrations lose prospect attention quickly.

Keep Loom for client updates. Do not make a Loom your portfolio.

Google Drive · please no

The folder named _FINAL_v3.

Drive is a hard drive with a sharing dialog — not a portfolio. SCORM zips do not run from Drive links, and “request access” emails kill momentum with prospects.

  • Free, ubiquitous, clients already use it for files.
  • Zero presentation next to a real portfolio page.
  • SCORM packages do not play from Drive.
  • Permission friction slows hiring conversations.

Fine for working files. Not your portfolio.

Wix / Squarespace · use it for the brand site

WixSquarespace

A beautiful site that cannot play SCORM.

A custom Squarespace or Wix site works for brand, services, and contact — then prospects ask to see interactive work. Link out to a TrainingOS portfolio where SCORM and case studies actually play.

  • Beautiful templates and easy branding.
  • Pairs with TrainingOS — “see my portfolio” CTA.
  • No in-browser SCORM player for course modules.
  • Interactive work often becomes another video embed.

Keep it for the marketing site. Link to your TrainingOS portfolio for proof of work.

TrainingOS · use it for

The link you send a prospect.

We are not SCORM Cloud or your brand site. We are the single URL where modules play, case studies read clearly, and hiring managers can act — SCORM, xAPI, and video in one portfolio.

Start free →

Which one should you actually pick?

/02 A short decision tree

Answer four questions. Save thirty.

  1. 1

    Are you a freelance or in-house ID with work to show?

    If no, none of this matters — go find a portfolio first. If yes, continue.

  2. 2

    Does your work include SCORM, xAPI, or interactive courses?

    If yes → SCORM Cloud or TrainingOS. If no, only video/PDF → a brand site + Loom is probably enough.

  3. 3

    Are you dispatching courses to client LMSes for money?

    If yes → SCORM Cloud, hands down. If no, you are showing portfolio work → TrainingOS wins on every other axis.

  4. 4

    Do prospects need to click and book a call after seeing your work?

    If yes, you need a portfolio surface — not a hosting backend. That is us.

Ready to send one link?

Start free — no card. Upgrade when you need more storage or want branding removed.